Two labels now sit side by side on a washing machine, and they do not say the same thing. The energy label speaks to what the appliance will cost to run. The durability index speaks to how long it will last and how repairable it is. Knowing how to read both, and above all understanding where each one stops, changes the way you weigh a purchase entirely.
What the durability index actually measures
Scored out of 10 and introduced by French anti-waste legislation for a circular economy, the durability index has replaced the repairability index on front-loading washing machines. This is not a simple change of name: the scope has widened.
The former repairability index rated only the ability to be repaired. The new index keeps that dimension and adds a reliability criterion, meaning resistance to use and structural robustness. An appliance that is easy to repair but fragile can therefore no longer score well.
In concrete terms, the scoring covers the availability and price of spare parts relative to the price of the appliance, ease of disassembly and the tools required, free access to technical documentation, along with reliability elements such as resistance and commercial warranty.
The criterion that weighs heaviest in practice is the price of spare parts. It is what decides, five years later, whether a fault gets repaired or the appliance goes for recycling. A washing machine whose control board costs half the price of a new one is doomed in advance, whatever its energy class.
On the relevant product pages, the official scoring grid is one click away, next to the price.
- Scored out of 10, it replaces the repairability index
- Adds reliability to repairability alone
- The price of spare parts is the most decisive criterion
- Official scoring grid available on the product page
Reading the energy label without being misled
The European energy label has rated washing machines from A to G since its overhaul. That point deserves emphasis because it still misleads many buyers: the former A+, A++ and A+++ classes have disappeared, and the scale was deliberately made stricter to leave room for technical progress.
An appliance rated C on the new scale is therefore nothing mediocre, and corresponds to a very good one on the old scale. Comparing a pre-reform label with a current one makes no sense at all.
The most useful figure is not the letter anyway. The label shows energy consumption for 100 cycles in kilowatt-hours, which allows direct comparison between models. It also gives water consumption per cycle in litres, capacity in kilograms, the duration of the eco programme, the spin class and noise levels.
One important subtlety: all those values are measured on the eco programme at full load, which is the standardised reference programme. It is not necessarily the one you will use day to day, and a quick programme consumes appreciably more. The label therefore serves to compare appliances with each other, not to predict your actual bill.
- Scale from A to G, the A+ to A+++ classes have gone
- Compare consumption per 100 cycles, not just the letter
- Values measured on the eco programme at full load
- A quick programme consumes noticeably more than eco
Why the eco programme is long, and why that is normal
This is the question everyone asks when faced with an eco programme lasting three to four hours. The explanation is counter-intuitive but simple.
Most of the energy a washing machine consumes goes not into turning the drum but into heating water. The eco programme therefore washes at a lower temperature and compensates by agitating for longer. Time replaces heat.
As a result, a three-hour eco cycle at 30 °C consumes noticeably less than a one-hour quick cycle at 60 °C, despite its length. The quick programme is designed to get you out of trouble on lightly soiled laundry, not to save energy.
There is therefore no contradiction in choosing a well-rated appliance and then complaining about its slowness: that mechanism is precisely what earns it its good score.
Spin speed, a criterion that spills over into drying
Spin speed is expressed in revolutions per minute and determines the residual moisture of your laundry at the end of the cycle.
A 1,000 rpm spin leaves laundry appreciably wetter than a 1,400 rpm one. If you dry on a line, the difference amounts to a longer drying time. If you use a tumble dryer, it becomes a real running cost: the wetter the laundry comes out, the harder that heavy-consuming appliance has to work.
The trade-off is therefore best made across the whole chain. A washing machine with a high spin speed may cost a little more to buy while reducing the combined washing and drying bill.
In return, a very powerful spin creases laundry more and puts more strain on delicate fabrics. Most appliances allow the speed to be adjusted by programme, which settles the question.
Noise, worth checking if the machine sits near the living space
The label shows the noise level during the spin phase, the noisiest, along with a class from A to D.
This criterion becomes decisive when the washing machine sits in an open-plan kitchen, a bathroom adjoining a bedroom, or a flat with lightweight partitions. Since the decibel scale is logarithmic, three decibels more doubles the sound power.
Induction motors, with no brushes and no belt, are appreciably quieter and more durable than traditional motors. They are also often paired with extended motor warranties, which is a useful signal of reliability.
Think about levelling too. A machine poorly set on its feet vibrates and becomes noisy whatever its original rating, and bearing wear accelerates.
Cross-referencing both labels to decide
The classic mistake is to choose on energy class alone. Yet the two indicators sometimes contradict each other, and that is precisely where the decision lies.
An appliance with an excellent energy rating but a poor durability index will save you a few euros a year, then become unrepairable at the first fault outside warranty. The economic and environmental outcome will be dreadful.
Conversely, a very durable but power-hungry appliance will weigh on you every month for fifteen years.
The right reading is to rule out weak durability indices from the start, then compare consumption within that shortlist. Durability works as a filter, energy as a tie-breaker.
One last useful reflex, and it is free: check the length of the commercial warranty, particularly on the motor and the tub. A manufacturer guaranteeing its motor for ten years is putting its liability on the line, which often says more than a great deal of marketing.
- Rule out weak durability indices first
- Then compare consumption within that shortlist
- Check the motor and tub warranty
- An unrepairable appliance cancels out any energy gain
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between the repairability and durability indices?
The durability index has replaced the repairability index on front-loading washing machines, and its scope is wider. Where the former rated only the ability to be repaired, the new one keeps that and adds reliability, meaning robustness and resistance to use. An appliance that is easy to repair but fragile can therefore no longer score well.
Is a washing machine rated C a poor choice?
No. The energy label was overhauled: the scale runs from A to G and the former A+, A++ and A+++ classes have gone. The scale was deliberately made stricter to leave room for technical progress, so that a current C corresponds to a very good appliance on the old scale. Compare the consumption per 100 cycles shown on the label instead.
Why does the eco programme take so long?
Because most of the energy goes into heating water, not into turning the drum. The eco programme washes at a lower temperature and compensates by agitating for longer: time replaces heat. A three-hour eco cycle at 30 °C therefore consumes noticeably less than a one-hour quick cycle at 60 °C. The quick programme exists to get you out of trouble, not to save energy.
Should I go for a 1400 rpm spin?
It depends how you dry. If you use a line, a lower spin simply means longer drying. If you use a tumble dryer, a high spin reduces residual moisture and therefore the workload of a heavy-consuming appliance: the extra purchase cost is recovered on the overall bill. Note that a powerful spin creases laundry more.
Which criterion counts most in the durability index?
The price of spare parts relative to the price of the appliance. It is what decides, a few years later, whether a fault gets repaired or the appliance goes for recycling. A washing machine whose control board costs half the price of a new one is doomed in advance, whatever its energy class. Availability of parts and access to technical documentation also carry weight.
Is it better to buy an economical or a durable appliance?
Both, taken in the right order. Rule out weak durability indices first, then compare consumption within that shortlist: durability acts as a filter, energy as a tie-breaker. An appliance with an excellent rating that becomes unrepairable at the first fault outside warranty cancels out any energy gain, economically and environmentally alike.
Ready to take the next step?
Browse our Laundry selection